Více než 4 miliony titulů v angličtině i dalších jazycích! Objevte svůj nový příběh ještě dnes!

Zjistit stav objednávky

Kontaktujte nás

Judicial Deliberations

A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy

Autor: Mitchel De S.-O.-L'E. Lasser

Jazyk:

Vazba: Brožovaná

Vydavatel: Oxford University Press

Dostupnost: 50 % šance

Prohledáme celý svět

1 562 Kč

Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassat...

Informace o knize

Autor

Mitchel De S.-O.-L'E. Lasser

Jazyk

Angličtina

Vazba

Kniha - Brožovaná

Vydáno

2009

Stránek

402

EAN

9780199575169

ISBN

0199575169

Enbook ID

04533331

Vydavatel

Oxford University Press

Hmotnost

584

Rozměry

236 x 159 x 27

Kompletní popis

Judicial Deliberations compares how and why the European Court of Justice, the French Cour de cassation and the US Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation, and ultimately judicial legitimacy. Examining the judicial argumentation of the United States Supreme Court and of the French Cour de cassation, the book first reorders the traditional comparative understanding of the difference between French civil law and American common law judicial decision-making. It then uses this analysis to offer the first detailed comparative examination of the interpretive practice of the European Court of Justice. Lasser demonstrates that the French judicial system rests on a particularly unified institutional and ideological framework founded on explicitly republican notions of meritocracy and managerial expertise. Law-making per se may be limited to the legislature; but significant judicial normative administration is entrusted to State selected, trained, and sanctioned elites who are policed internally through hierarchical institutional structures. The American judicial system, by contrast, deploys a more participatory and democratic approach that reflects a more populist vision. Shunning the unifying, controlling, and hierarchical French structures, the American judicial system instead generates its legitimacy primarily by argumentative means. American judges engage in extensive debates that subject them to public scrutiny and control. The ECJ hovers delicately between the institutional/argumentative and republican/democratic extremes. On the one hand, the ECJ reproduces the hierarchical French discursive structure on which it was originally patterned. On the other, it transposes this structure into a transnational context of fractured political and legal assumptions. This drives the ECJ towards generating legitimacy by adopting a somewhat more transparent argumentative approach.

Nejčastěji hledané

Categories

Authors

Publishers

Produkty

Produkty

Nejčastěji hledané

Categories

Authors

Publishers

Produkty

Produkty

Judicial Deliberations

A Comparative Analysis of Transparency and Legitimacy

Informace o knize

Kompletní popis

Mohlo by vás zajímat

Angelina; OR, L'amie inconnue

TOM CLANCY LINE OF DEMARCATION

Never Wake

Haddock Or Halibut?

International Trade Theory

Blackstone's Guide to the Equality Act 2010

Jumpstart Your Bookkeeping Business

If I Were the Antichrist...

Job-Embedded Professional Development

In a World Created by a Drunken God

Applying Fuzzy Mathematics to Formal Models in Comparative Politics

Automating the Design of Data Mining Algorithms

Zákaznicí kteří koupili tuto knihu koupili také

Spiegelbilder

Abrázame, mamá

Bleach - Brennendes Schlachtfeld

Industriemeister Sageindustrie - Das prufungsrelevante Wissen

Deutsche Heldensagen

E-learning jako prostředek pro rozvoj cizojazyčného akademického psaní v anglick

De grenzen van duurzaam partnerschap. Deel V

You're My Cutie! 03